Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Results Group, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:15 pm
The right of smokers to go to court to challenge claims by tobacco companies that the health risk is less if they use "light" cigarettes will be weighed in Altria Group, et al., v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 10:03 pm
Good, et al., 07-562). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
August 24, 2015) — Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Regulation of Deceptive Trade Practices. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am
Newman, et al., was sent to the Court just days before a filing deadline. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
The case is Altria Group Inc., et al., v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
This lawsuit follows a similar action filed by the Federal Trade Commission last year, wherein the Commission argued 1-800 Contacts “restricted competition beyond the scope of any property right that 1-800 Contacts may have in its trademarks” by entering into “bidding agreements. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The Working Group on Securities Disclosure Authority respectfully submits these comments on the Commission’s recent proposal related to mandated, standardized climate-related disclosures for investors. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:38 pm
Tiny Lab Productions, et al. and Balderas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
Inc., et al., No. 09-cv-01597 (N.D. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
Penguin Group, et al. (08-1039). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Lin Pi-Chu Yang and Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. et al v. 486353 B.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument at 10 a.m. next Monday in Free Enterprise Fund, et al., v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm
Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et al., No. 16-108 (Achates redux – review of statute-of-limitations for filing IPR requests) Post Grant Admin: Pactiv LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
